HomeNewsOpinionSportBusinessArtsLife & StyleS & TEducationHealthJobsClassifiedsToday's PaperTopicsInternationalNationalStatesThe India CablesThe Pakistan Cables Cities: BangaloreChennaiCoimbatoreDelhiHyderabadKochiMaduraiMangaloreThiruvananthapuramTiruchirapalliVijayawadaVisakhapatnam News» NationalJaipur,February 25, 2012Term ‘sexy' not negative: NCW chief's remark triggers protests PTI Share · Comment(3) · print · National Commission for Women Chairperson Mamta Sharma on Saturday sparked a controversy by saying that the word “sexy” should not be taken in a negative connotation, drawing criticism from the Bharatiya Janata Party and other women's organisations which termed her remark “shocking” and “demoralising” for women.Speaking at a function here, Ms. Sharma said problems start when we treat it as negative. “Boys pass comments about girls, terming them sexy. But sexy means beautiful and charming. We should not see it in a negative sense,” she said at the function organised by a women's organisation.Soon after the programme, the BJP criticised Ms. Sharma and accused her of promoting eve-teasing by giving such statements.BJP's State vice-president Suman Sharma said, “it is shameful that a woman who holds a responsible position at the national level has such thoughts about women.” “Her comments are demoralising for women and she should be removed from the NCW immediately,” she said. Keywords: National Commission for Women Chairperson Mamta Sharma, BJP, sexual remarks
Share Tweet RelatedTOPICSsocial issueComments:
I think Mamta Sharma is correct. The word "sexy" has nothing to do with sex. As she says, it only means "beautiful", "attractive", "very good" and so on to a superlative degree. In any language usage changes the connotation. For example, "cool" does not mean low temperature. It again means "good", etc.
from: Mohanraj Posted on: Feb 26, 2012 at 03:47 ISTThe word sexy may have become commonplace among Boys and Girls. But, the main problem is -many Girls do want to dress in sexy dresses - to attract Boys. Either intentionally or unintentionally, they do raise thoughts and ideas in the Boys. Dress in public Places must be decent and dignified and should not be SEXY - in such connotation. If dresses of Girls are purposefully made, to raise ideas of sex in Boys, it is not good for either the boys or the girls. What is being shown in movies, is doing such damage already - leading to rapes and eve-teasing of helpless, innocent Girls, by people whose minds are spoiled by the outrageous dresses and behaviours on silver screen.
from: v.vijayamohan Posted on: Feb 26, 2012 at 17:44 ISTI think Mamata Sharma and Mohanraj are correct if dictionary meaning is taken. However certain words though English when used in our country has different meaning on account of its long currency of that understanding. So Mamata Sharma should have explained the whole story. However it is not correct to term certain actions as " just between boys and girls as tamash", because it amounts to encouraging a culture that is alien.The boy/girl friend system or culture is most unIndian. All can be friends. Those who are in love are finace and finacee. Let us not imitate western culture intoto.
from: K.C.Thomas Posted on: Feb 27, 2012 at 09:37 ISTYour Name:
email: Make a comment
characters left
1. Comments will be moderated
2. Comments that are abusive, personal, incendiary or irrelevant cannot be
published.
3. Please write complete sentences. Do not type comments in all capital letters,
or in all lower case letters, or using abbreviated text (example: u cannot
substitute for you, d is not 'the', n is not 'and').
4. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.
5. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name, to avoid rejection.
Slideshow
Day in pictures - February 27, 2012Bhopal gas victims protest in New Delhi, government supporters rally in Colombo, and The Artist and Hugo sweep the Oscars. A selection of images from India and around the world. more slideshows»
Most PopularMost CommentedISI-linked businessman claimed the financial backing of mystery Indian political family"It's my duty and right to visit Arunachal"Set up special panel on linking of rivers forthwith, Supreme Court tells Centre New twist in 2G case may turn on meaning of ‘acquisition'Dow paid U.S. firms to spy on Bhopal activists: WikiLeaks emails NRI custody row: India rushes special envoy to OsloNo looking back for Gujarat, says ModiAnti-Kudankulam stir may be aimed at scuttling nuclear programme, feel expertsNCTC not to be operational from March 1SC reserves order on shifting of Aarushi murder trial Set up special panel on linking of rivers forthwith, Supreme Court tells Centre ISI-linked businessman claimed the financial backing of mystery Indian political family"It's my duty and right to visit Arunachal"No looking back for Gujarat, says ModiNew twist in 2G case may turn on meaning of ‘acquisition'PM for hassle-free, cashless outpatient careChina cannot interfere in India's domestic affairs: Krishna Small loans add up to lethal debtsNavy, Coast Guard to be better equipped As Manmohan speaks out, Russia says its suspicion has been confirmed 
About UsContactsArchivesSubscriptionsRSS FeedsSite MapHomeNewsOpinionSportBusinessArtsLife & StyleS & TEducationHealthJobsClassifiedsToday's PaperTopicsGroup SitesThe HinduBusiness LineSportstarFrontlinePublicationseBooksImagesDisclaimer: The Hindu is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.
Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen areexpressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu.
Comments to : web.thehindu@thehindu.co.in Copyright © 2012, The Hindu
No comments:
Post a Comment