infolinks

Showing posts with label Woman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Woman. Show all posts

Sunday, May 13, 2012

'Survivor' 2012 finale predictions: Which sexy woman will be the winner?

Sexy Women of 'Survivor One World'

In a "Survivor" season billed as the battle of the sexes, the clear winner has already been determined as the show heads to the season finale tonight: The women.

After Wednesday’s tribal council vote, when crazy Tarzan was given the boot, only five castaways remain in contention for the million-dollar prize, and all of them are female. (All of them also happen to be attractive, which is keeping the show's ratings alive in this somewhat boring season.)

Here's a look at the Final 5, in alphabetical order, and their chances of winning the title on "Survivor: One World":

ALICIA ROSA — She’s a 25-year-old special education teacher who likes to show off her assets with very revealing bathing suits. She’s also very feisty and isn’t likely to get many votes if she ends up in the Final 3. On the other hand, she might be able to talk a good talk to the jury and snag a few votes.

CHELSEA MEISSNER — She’s a very attractive 26-year-old medical sales rep and self-proclaimed “country girl” who impressed the men early this season when she caught two wild chickens with her bare hands. Chelsea seems to get along with most of the castaways and is a very close ally of this season’s front-runner, Kim. With those factors in her favor, there’s a good chance we’ll see her sitting in the Final 3. Or maybe not. Perhaps Kim will feel threatened by Chelsea at the end and discard her loyalty?

CHRISTINA CHA — She’s a 29-year-old career consultant with great looks but no-so-great friendships on the island. She might end up in the Final 3, only because another castaway – Sabrina – is a tougher competitor and might talk the jury into giving her the big cash prize.

KIM SPRADLIN — She’s a 29-year-old bridal shop owner who enjoys playing beach volleyball. She’s got a bright smile, great athleticism and strategic skills to match. She has been firmly controlling this game since early on, and I believe she has the best shot at winning the million bucks. She can use her hidden immunity idol during the first tribal council tonight, and if she can manage to win the next immunity challenge, she’ll be in great shape to win it all.

SABRINA THOMPSON — She’s a 33-year-old high school teacher with a lot of Brooklyn attitude and strong athleticism. Her feistiness this season ticked off some castaways, and she was perceived as lazy around camp, so her chances of winning the title are slim.

survivor-one-world-female-tribe-5.JPGCBSSeveral of the prettiest, and most athletic, members of the female tribe on 'Survivor: One World' quickly bonded and formed an alliance on Day 1. The alliance has remained strong all season. The finale airs tonight, May 13, at 8 p.m. on CBS.

Who will end up in the Final 3?

I'm predicting Kim, Chelsea and Christina — with Kim emerging as sole Survivor. Why? Because she played a great game and deserves it the most. She controlled the game, successfully plotting to knock out all the men and keeping the female alliance strong to the end, so there will certainly be a lot of animosity among the male jury members. However, as history has proven on Survivor, most jurors tend to put their animosity aside and reward the contestants who played the best game without being nasty. Kim fits that bill.

That’s just my rambling, Survivor fans. What do you guys think? Cast a vote in our reader poll or post a comment below.

CHECK BACK TONIGHT for an update on the show as soon as the winner is revealed. The show runs from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m. on CBS, followed by the one-hour cast reunion.

Follow @LensReality
!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");


MORE COVERAGE OF 'SURVIVOR'

• 'Survivor One World' recap: The island of misfit boys - and uncoordinated girls

• 'Survivor One World' recap: 10 things you need to know if you missed the season premiere

• New 'Survivor' season starts tonight with all-new cast, some new gimmicks (see cast photos)

• 'Survivor South Pacific' winner revealed, and it's a big upset

• 'Survivor South Pacific' recap: An ungodly bonehead move before the Final 4

• 'Survivor' Redemption Island winner: Fourth time is charm for Boston Rob

• 'Survivor Nicaragua' winner 'Fabio' gets last laugh, dude


View the original article here

Monday, January 23, 2012

Woman barred from every club in town over 'sexy' clobber

Furious Lisa Woodman was barred from three venues because of her low-cut tops, short skirts and knee-length boots.

The 5ft 3in blonde admits she likes to flaunt her size six figure and 36DD boobs but claims her outfits are conservative when compared with those of younger girls.

She was left in tears on New Year's Eve when doormen turned her away and told her: "You're too old to wear that get-up."

Lisa has also been banned from two other nightclubs which are all owned by the same company in Worcester unless she tones down her appearance.

The mum-of-four, a medical secretary at a hospital hygiene company, stormed: "What's wrong with what I wear?

"I'm not hurting anyone am I? I am covering everything, and I just want to have a good time.

"We never cause any trouble and we've never been rude to the bouncers.

"None of the pubs give me any hassle about my outfits so why do the nightclubs have such a problem?

"There were teenagers and girls in their 20s wearing much more revealing outfits but they went straight in.

"When I asked the bouncers why me and my sister weren't allowed in her just said: 'You're too old to wear that get-up.'

"I couldn't believe it, I'm only 28 and still consider myself young."

Lisa started hitting the town last year after splitting from her long-term partner and father of her children Josh, 12, Jamie, 10, and daughters Billie, six, and three-year-old Angel.

She had a boob job in April and regularly works out in the gym to keep her figure.

"I always like to look sexy when I go out on the town," she said.

"I split up from my partner last year and I was really upset so I had a boob job in April and got into shape going to the gym and now I just want to flaunt what I've got.

"I normally wear short skirts and one-piece outfits which might be revealing but never show off too much.

"I like my high-heel boots and mini-skirts. I've got loads of them, they usually cost between ?20 and ?50 but I when I let my hair down I like to look my best."

Lisa enjoys a night on the town in Worcester once a fortnight with her sister Sarah, 32.

They usually end the evening at one of the city's three nightclubs, Mode, Tramps, or Velvet.

But Lisa claims some of the doormen have humiliated her when turning her away.

She said: "One doorman even made me walk up and down and turn around in front of people laughing at what I was wearing.

"I was totally in shock and really humiliated. I look after myself and I'm only 28.

"I just want to be treated with a bit of respect.

"I rang the nightclub to complain but they just don't listen.

"The door staff told me I was banned for life unless I dress differently. It's outrageous."

Her sister Sarah, a mum-of-one, said: "If we were rude to the bouncers they really would never let us in so we're always polite and say 'Hi, how are you?'

"But it's always the same response - 'You ain't getting in tonight girls'."

Yesterday nightclub bosses defended their ban, saying they had a "responsible door policy".

Dean Hill, director of Nexum Leisure, which runs the clubs, said: "We expect people to make an effort and we have a dress code of smart casual.

"It is the venue managers who are on the doors, they make decisions on the doors based on our policies.

"They make judgements based on someone's behaviour, their dress, if they're abusive and whether they have ID.

"And that is to make sure all our customers have a good night.

"At the end of the day, it's private premises and we reserve the right to refuse entry for anyone."


View the original article here